It’s hard to believe that it has now been over 14 years since the 2011 quake and meltdowns. Lets have a look at future world trends concerning nuclear power. Nuclear’s share of total electricity generation is projected to decrease: the International Energy Agency (IEA) projects a 22% increase in nuclear generation by 2050, but this will be less than the projected growth of renewable energy, resulting in nuclear’s share of global electricity generation falling from about 10% currently to about 8% in 2050.

However, just as I was about to post this, news from Germany: Three weeks after widespread power grid failures across Portugal and Spain, triggered by unreliable solar and wind power, Germany appears to be sharply recalibrating its energy stance. In a notable policy shift, the new conservative government has reversed its longstanding opposition to nuclear power. The move reflects a growing understanding in Berlin that over-reliance on unreliable solar and wind power generation poses serious risks to economic stability and energy security (lack of access to cheap Russian fossils would be another important reason). The shift also signals a broader return to common-sense energy policymaking in Europe, with nuclear power increasingly viewed as critical in France in achieving reliable, low-carbon power generation.

Next, a point I wasn’t aware of when writing my book, is the consequences of the fact that nuclear power only produces electricity, as do renewables. I stumbled upon an important interview with petroleum/geology specialist Art Berman in which he points out that even fusion power, if it can be harnessed, will still only produce electricity, yet key areas that keep our current civilisation functioning require process heatin continuous mass quantities. Specifically, fertilisers, plus steel, petrochemicals, concrete,  and plastics: all need tremendous amounts of heat; heat that, at the moment, comes from burning coal. Heavy industry is responsible for around 22 percent of global CO2 emissions. Forty-two percent of that — about 10 percent of global emissions — comes from combustion to produce large amounts of high-temperature heat for industrial products like cement, steel, and petrochemicals.

Meanwhile Japan: what changes have occurred in Japan in the last two years? A recent survey by the Asahi Shimbun newspaper showed 51% of respondents favoured restarting nuclear plants, with 42% opposed. This is a major change in sentiment compared to the initial years after the meltdowns, when almost every Japanese citizen was vehemently opposed to using nuclear power.

In a draft strategic energy plan due to be approved by the Japanese cabinet, the trade and industry ministry signalled it was ditching attempts to lessen Japan’s reliance on nuclear power in the wake of the Fukushima disaster.The document dropped a reference to “reducing reliance” on nuclear energy and instead called for a “maximisation” of nuclear power, which will account for about 20% of total energy output in 2040, based on the assumption that 30 reactors will be in full operation by then.The plan envisages a share of between 40% and 50% for renewable energy – compared with just under a third in 2023 – and a reduction in coal-fired power from the current 70% to 30-40%. In other words, a mixed source of energy supplies, with renewables as the most dominant; also a large reduction in Japan’s expensive imports of fossil fuels which must be paid for in dollars.

Speaking of renewables, Japan has completed the successful deployment of its first megawatt-scale tidal turbine, the AR1100. Installed in the Naru Strait (Nagasaki Prefecture), this 1.1 MW tidal turbine represents a major breakthrough in marine energy technology. As Japan moves towards a sustainable, fossil-fuel-free future, tidal energy is poised to play a crucial role in the country’s energy transition.

Meanwhile, progress in de-commissioning the stricken Fukushima Dai-ichi reactors proceeds incrementally. Investigators used the robot’s fishing-rod-like arm to clip and collect a tiny piece of radioactive material from one of the plant’s three damaged reactors – the first time such a feat has been achieved (see image above).

The tiny sample will be studied for clues about conditions inside the reactors – a crucial step towards decommissioning the Dai-ichi plant. About 880 tons of extremely hazardous melted material remain within, 14 years after two tsunamis caused by a 9.0-magnitude earthquake overwhelmed the plant, destroying all power systems designed to cool the reactor cores.

Removing debris from the reactors is regarded as the most daunting challenge in the decades-long decommissioning project. The robots are small, must navigate debris-laden and and waterlogged reactor buildings that are extremely radioactive, scrape off tiny amounts from 880 tonsof melted nuclear fuel, then bring it out of the ruins, all without releasing radioactivity into the air. Completion of total plant de-commissioning by 2051 seems seriously over-optimistic.  By November 2022 around $82 billion had already been spent to deal with the 2011 disaster.

Interesting story from Miyagi, the prefecture north of Fukushima that was also hit by the devastating tsunamis in 2011. It seems that the head monk at a temple there had bought an old second-hand Seiko clock, more than 100 years old, which he hung in the temple building. 

March 11^th marks the 10^th anniversary of the Tōhoku tsunami and consequent Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear meltdowns. It’s hard to believe it’s been a decade already. 

My memories of that time include the quake itself rocking our Tokyo apartment – the strongest one I have ever experienced, a 5.8 on the Richter scale, as household goods came crashing down around me. Of the many images broadcast on Japanese TV in the hours after the tsunami hit, the one that really stayed with me was an image of an entire house on fire being carried inland, across rice fields, by the tsunami. 

Very little, other than the damage to the reputation of Fukushima fish (which is completely unwarranted) and to sales for Fukushima fishermen. This is based in fear rather than science.

Your question mentions contaminated water, as if the water was being pumped straight out of the reactor basements. This will not be the case. It is first treated to remove most radioactive contaminants.

After the explosions at Fukushima Dai-ichi scattered radiation in much of the prefecture, more than 40 countries refused to import food items from Japan, dealing a grievous blow to the famers and fishermen of the prefecture. In addition, many within Japan would also not buy food or fish products from Fukushima and neighbouring prefectures.

One unintended consequences of the Fukushima nuclear disaster almost a decade ago is that Japan now plans to build as many as 22 new coal-burning power plants — one of the dirtiest sources of electricity — at 17 different sites over the next five years. This is at a time when the world needs to slash carbon dioxide emissions to fight global warming. Together, the 22 power plants would emit almost as much carbon dioxide annually as all the passenger cars sold each year in the United States.

In just three years the Fukushima Dai-ichi site will have no more room to make the specialised tanks that are used store water that has been used to cool the melted reactors, or has seeped through the site from the surrounding hills. There’s currently over 1.15 million tons of this radioactive water being stored at the facility in 960 tanks and it’s continuing to accumulate at a rate of about 150 tons a day, meaning the tanks could reach full capacity by the summer of 2022.

It has been eight years now since the meltdowns, and the water just off the Dai-ichi plant still contains contamination that washed there from the plant. But, a little further away, Kitai-izumi Beach is now open again. It is a popular spot for surfers as it gets some of the best waves in Japan, as you can see in the photo.

As of January last year a report out of TEPCO and the various parties involved in decommissioning documents that 15 workers from Fukushima Daiichi have developed cancer.

A major problem at Fukushima Dai-ichi is the flow of groundwater through the plant from the surrounding hills. This water flows into the irradiated debris in the basements of the destroyed reactors and then from there into the sea.